Long Beach, CA
The largest anthropogenic stressor to
this area is urbanization.
ACT News 2019. https://www.act-news.com/news/long-beach-becoming-fuel-cell-and-hydrogen-hot-spot/
The construction of infrastructure involves deteriorating
natural soil conditions. The Cataline
ironwood is the most “at risk” species out of the two that I have chosen. Racoons will be fine as they have adapted to
live in urban environments already and have a much larger distribution.
Under the RCP 8.5 scenario, this area is expected to increase
temperature with little change in precipitation (Climate Explorer 20211). This will not influence the earthquakes that
impact this region. However, this could
increase the rates of hurricane activity in this area. Cataline ironwoods will be most vulnerable
because they are sessile and cannot relocate in the event of an earthquake or
hurricane.
A conservation plan for this area would include the promotion of environmentally friendly products such as biodegradable material being used for everyday products. The increase in renewable energy would help combat climate change and reduce the extraction of natural resources around the city. Another part of this plan would to be to build small preserves within the city, like the Jewell Moore Nature Reserve at UCA. This would act as a sanctuary for species such as the racoons, and Cataline Ironwoods. These reserves are generally appealing to humans and would simultaneously be a “safe zone” for local biota. The last part of this plan would be the inclusion of an environmental impact analysis necessary for any further expansion of urban areas around the area. This would allow for the consideration of the harms to the environment before the construction of new infrastructure both within the city and in surrounding areas.
San Bernardino National Forest
Wildfires are an anthropogenic stressor to this area.
Riggs 2017. https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2013/08/12/forest-service-launches-new-wildland-fire-website
Human activity in this area has contributed to more
wildfires than would naturally occur.
This area has stuck with the Smokey the Bear campaign for 75 years (USDA
2021). The Forest Service in this area
actively suppresses fire regardless of the source of the fire. This leads to the accumulation of ‘fuel’ such
as dead wood and leaves on the forest floor that make future fires more
intense. Human activities such as shooting
fireworks, campfires, cars etc. have caused fires in the area and are currently
being regulated by the Forest Service.
The western juniper is the most vulnerable species in this area because
it resides in mid elevations on the leeward side of the mountains in this
region. While they will have succession
after the fire, the time taken to recover is extensive and might be at risk in
light of climate change.
Under the RCP 8.5 scenario, this area is expected to
increase in temperature with little change in precipitation (Climate Explorer
20212). Increased
temperatures will allow for wildfires to become more frequent and intense. This will likely impact Bald Eagles the
most. Trees are able to survive in much warmer
temperatures than they are adapted to. The
same cannot be said about some aquatic species such as salmon, which is what t
he eagles feed on. The eagles would be losing a substantial food source while
the western juniper will be able to survive.
A conservation plan in this area would entail a stricter law
enforcement system for the national forest.
Laws are already implemented to prevent behavior that can cause harm to
the forest, but most are punishable by fines.
It would be possible to develop punishments more deterring than that of
a fine or increase the fines astronomically. Another part of this plan would be
to raise public awareness on the importance of maintaining a healthy ecosystem,
especially in a protected area such as this.
People should want to not harm the forest. This can be done with well-developed arguments
over concepts such as biophilia, the need for healthy forests, and the
irrationality of purposely harming the forest.
These arguments could be delivered during tours, individual
conversation, websites, media, or even advertisements. A third part to this plan could include the
temporary closing of the forest to the public.
Perhaps there could be certain parts of the year in which part of, or
the entire forest would be closed to public access. The use of these three parts could
potentially be effective at preserving the forest and are economically
justified. The parts of the plan that
cost money such as advertising, staffing more law enforcement, and partial
closure of the area would be compensated by the heavier fines and lower cost of
treatment (such as having to put out more fires, pollution cleanup, etc.).
Mojave National Preserve
Anthropogenic fragmentation is a stressor for this
environment.
NPS 2013. http://npshistory.com/publications/foundation-documents/moja-fd-2013.pdf
The main source of fragmentation in this area is by roads
that run through the reserve and the possibility of future road construction in
the same manner. Some roads cause fragmentation
within the habitat, but others cause fragmentation between the reserve and
other reserves (NPS 2013). Fragmentation
can cause losses of biodiversity and natural resources for the National Mojave
Preserve due to a decrease in immigration and emigration while increasing disturbance
frequency. The Great Basin Collared
Lizard would most likely be the most vulnerable in face of this stressor. While they may be territorial, they still
need to move across the reserve for mating and colonization. Additional roads would be an impediment for
this process to occur.
Under the RCP 8.5 scenario, this area would experience an
increase in temperature (Climate Explorer 20213). It is also suggested that the area will increase
in precipitation variability (NPS 2009).
Climate change will mainly affect the climate extremes that this area
experiences. Droughts will be more
extensive. Animals will be energetically
stressed, and plants will increase in evapotranspiration rates (NPS 2009). The Creosote Bush will most likely be the
most vulnerable to climate change issues as it will be more affected by the loss
of water. It will be more prone to death
by fire and dehydration as the area will become warmer and will have longer
periods without precipitation in face of climate change.
A conservation plan for this area would entail the reduction
of road construction both inside of the preserve and in surrounding areas near
other preserves. The reduction of road
construction would decrease the amount of fragmentation for both the Mojave
National Preserve as well as other preserves in the area. The reduction of road construction would reduce
noise pollution caused by the machinery used in the construction process as
well as the use of automobiles on the road after construction. The reduction of roads would reduce possible chemical
pollution/leaching from asphalt as well as particulate matter from the roads littering
the preserve. The reducing of road
construction in this area is justified economically because less money is being
spent to construct the roads and requires less money for maintenance then it would
with more roads. The need for more roads
in this area is little. The amount of
traffic that goes through the desert is not enough to justify the need for more
roads. The additional convenience for
drivers is not worth permanent damage to a unique ecosystem such as this one.
Works Cited
The Climate
Explorer. 20211. “Long Beach, CA”. https://crt-climate-explorer.nemac.org/local-climate-charts/?county=Los%2BAngeles%2BCounty&city=Long%20Beach%2C%20CA&fips=06037&lat=33.7700504&lon=-118.1937395&zoom=7&nav=local-climate-charts&id=pcpn
The Climate
Explorer. 2021.2. “San Bernardino, CA”. https://crt-climate-explorer.nemac.org/local-climate-charts/?county=San%2BBernardino%2BCounty&city=San%20Bernardino%2C%20CA&fips=06071&lat=34.1083449&lon=-117.2897652&zoom=7&nav=local-climate-charts&id=pcpn
The Climate
Explorer. 20213. “Ivanpah,CA”. https://crt-climate-explorer.nemac.org/local-climate-charts/?county=San%2BBernardino%2BCounty&city=Ivanpah%2C%20CA&fips=06071&lat=35.34055599999999&lon=-115.309722&zoom=7&nav=local-climate-charts&id=days_dry_days
NPS. 2009.
“Mojave National Preserve Action Plan” Climate Friendly Parks. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/climatechange/upload/MOJA-CFP-Action-Plan-508Compliant.pdf
NPS. 2013. “Foundation
Document: Mojave National Preserve”. NPS History. http://npshistory.com/publications/foundation-documents/moja-fd-2013.pdf
Riggs, Keith.
2017. “Forest Service Launches New Wildland Fire Website” USDA. https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2013/08/12/forest-service-launches-new-wildland-fire-website
USDA. 2021. “Fire
Management” San Bernardino Nationforest. https://www.fs.usda.gov/main/sbnf/fire
Comments
Post a Comment